The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction in the Social Sciences - Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science - B Glassner - Libros - Springer - 9789048184606 - 25 de diciembre de 2010
En caso de que portada y título no coincidan, el título será el correcto

The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction in the Social Sciences - Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science Softcover reprint of hardcover 1st ed. 1989 edition

Precio
$ 107,49
sin IVA

Pedido desde almacén remoto

Entrega prevista 29 de jun. - 10 de jul.
Añadir a tu lista de deseos de iMusic

Without of course adopting a Platonic metaphysics, the eighteenth-century philosophes were Grecophiles who regarded the Athenian philosophers as their intellectual forbearers and mentors. Aprerequisite for this power was knowledge of the underlying causes of natural events, knowledge that required quantitative precision.


Publisher Marketing: Without of course adopting a Platonic metaphysics, the eighteenth-century philosophes were Grecophiles who regarded the Athenian philosophers as their intellectual forbearers and mentors. So powerful was their identification with c1assification that ancient ideas were taken as keys to the design of the modem world, but usually the ideas were taken separately and as divided from their systematic context. The power of number was an idea the En lightenment thinkers deployed with their legendary passion and vigor, particularly as an instrument for social reconstruction. It is no exaggemtion to say that the role of quantities in contemporary social scientific theorizing cannot be understood with any depth absent a recollection of the philosophes' axial development of the notion of quantification. It is a commonplace that for the philosophes progress required releasing human abilities to have power over nature. Aprerequisite for this power was knowledge of the underlying causes of natural events, knowledge that required quantitative precision. Enlightenment thinkers were sufficiently aware of themselves as products of their time to appreciate the importance of a liberal social environment to the knowledge enterprise; the supposition that the reverse is also the case, that enhanced knowledge could advance social conditions, came easily."

Contributor Bio:  Moreno, Jonathan Jonathan D. Moreno is the Emily Davie and Joseph S. Kornfeld Professor and Director of the Center for Biomedical Ethics at the University of Virginia. He is an elected member of the Institute of Medicine, an advisor to the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress. He has been a senior staff member for two presidential ethics commissions and is past president of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

Medios de comunicación Libros     Paperback Book   (Libro con tapa blanda y lomo encolado)
Publicado 25 de diciembre de 2010
ISBN13 9789048184606
Editores Springer
Páginas 236
Dimensiones 155 × 235 × 13 mm   ·   335 g
Editor Glassner, B.
Editor Moreno, J.D.

Mere med samme udgiver